Colorado Republican Party

COGOP Unified Forensic Briefing

February 28, 2026 v1.3 LIMITED RELEASE
Active Investigation
This document reflects an ongoing forensic examination. Findings, evidence citations, and structural components may be updated as additional data is recovered or verified. Version 1.3 — Limited Release.

In March 2025, the outgoing administration of the Colorado Republican Party deleted 200 GB of workspace data across 19 accounts (per the 60-Day Report, public record). In February 2026, individuals documented in that transition reappear in coordination emails targeting the removal of the sitting chairwoman. The deletions, the emails, the logins, and the draft versions are documented below.

“To make it easier, Anna put the question of removal on the form for you so you can get going as soon as you’d like to.”
Dave Williams to Jason Ensz · CC: Russ Andrews, Anna Ferguson · February 13, 2026 at 4:55 PM MST
Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c · All four principals on a single thread
12 of 14
Williams–Andrews emails
deleted from Secretary’s account
bylaws violations identified
in the “Official Call” process
14
Williams–Andrews emails
recovered from Google Vault

Current and former party officers coordinated to remove the sitting chairwoman through the party secretary. This examination cross-referenced 2,355 emails, administrative audit logs, court filings, and public records. Eight procedural violations were identified. The deleted communications, recovered from Google Vault, are cited below with Gmail message IDs and timestamps.

Dave Williams
Former Chairman · Not a current SCC member · CC’d on coordination emails with Andrews and Ferguson
Russ Andrews
Secretary & Treasurer · Issued “Official Call” for special meeting · 12 of 14 Williams emails deleted
Anna Ferguson
Former Secretary · RRC newsletter operator · Distributed petition to ~450 recipients
Richard Holtorf
Vice-Chair (resigned Feb 3, effective Feb 28) · Sent draft resignation to Andrews before notifying Chair
Brita Horn
Current Chairwoman, elected by majority vote · Subject of the removal action
Jason Ensz
Saguache County Chair · Petition circulator · Williams sent petition form directly to him
Raymond Garcia
Petition sponsor · Collected 137 of 502 signatures · Used unauthorized Google Form
ACT I

The Players

The individuals documented in the email record

The email record documents coordination between a former chairman who holds no current party office, the current Secretary, the former Secretary, and the outgoing Vice-Chair regarding the removal of the current chairwoman. Their roles are documented in their own emails.

DW

Dave Williams

Former Chairman (2023–2025) · Senior Advisor, International Trade Administration, Dept. of Commerce · Trump #47 appointee since July 1, 2025
Directs Operation

Former CRC Chairman and state representative. Contested removal vote on July 27, 2024, invalidated by Judge Eric Bentley for procedural deficiencies (Case 2024CV31638). During the March–April 2025 transition, the workspace logged 19 account deletions, 9,252 file deletion events, and 4 OAuth data migration authorizations. Now a federal political appointee at the International Trade Administration in Washington, DC.

On November 17, 2025, Andrews reported that the congressional delegation had met with Williams and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles before Williams’ appointment, and that Williams was “prohibited from participating in CO politics in any way, shape or form” as a condition of his position. Andrews also reported that the White House had initiated an Inspector General investigation into Williams. [Reported — Andrews’ account of information from Rep. Jeff Hurd’s office]

In February 2026 — three months after that warning — the email record shows Williams providing petition templates from “the last administration,” answering SCC member questions on Andrews’ behalf, instructing Ferguson to create forms, and telling Ensz to distribute them. Holds no current party office.

Key email: Feb 13, 2026 (Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c) — assigns specific roles to each participant and provides petition infrastructure from his former administration.

RA

Russ Andrews

CRC Secretary & Treasurer
The Mechanism

Holds dual control: membership roster, petition verification, meeting logistics, and party finances. Replaced Anna Ferguson as Secretary — the same person he now coordinates with. From Carbondale, Garfield County, where his email editor Evan Morris is county Vice-Chair. Former candidate for State Representative, HD-57.

Issued what he titled an “Official Call” for a removal meeting on February 8. The bylaws do not grant the Secretary independent authority to call meetings (Art. VII, §D(2)). 86% of Williams-related emails (12 of 14) were deleted from his account, compared to 25% of the overall mailbox.

On November 17, 2025, Andrews warned party leadership that Williams was under an Inspector General investigation, that the congressional delegation feared “legal issues” from interacting with him, and referred to Williams as “the toilet bug.” Three months later, Andrews was executing Williams’ petition plan.

On Feb 13, wrote “I will resign NEVER” to a critic and “I will happily resign” to a supporter within one hour. Both emails deleted. See Act III, Step 6.

Full Andrews Investigative Findings →
AF

Anna Ferguson

Former Secretary (under Williams) · RRC Newsletter Operator
Distribution Channel

Served as Secretary under the Williams administration. After that administration ended, she registered grassrootsconnect.us in September 2024 and operates Restore REAL Colorado (RRC), which presents itself as an independent grassroots voice. Public domain records confirm Ferguson is the registrant (EX-007, WHOIS). Co-plaintiff in Ferguson v. Horn/Bremer (Case 2025CV30292, dismissed July 2025).

Williams directed her to customize the removal petition form. She distributed it via RRC to approximately 450 SCC members (per sent folder analysis) — the same day Andrews sent his “Meeting to Proceed” BCC blast.

RH

Richard Holtorf

Vice-Chair (elected July 2025 to fill vacancy; resigned Feb 3, effective Feb 28) · Former State Rep, HD-63
Dual Channel

Maintained concurrent communication with Williams over a five-month period while serving in Horn’s executive team. On October 2, when Horn asked to see his Williams conversations, Holtorf refused, citing legal counsel. He confirmed the texts existed. He attended a November meeting at JeffCo GOP HQ with Williams, Ferguson, Chuck Bonniwell, and Rich Wyatt, reporting back to Horn that he went “as an individual citizen.” He was CRC Vice-Chair.

Sent his draft resignation to Andrews for review before notifying the Chair (Gmail ID: 19c250ffee948484; EX-002). Within 18 hours, Ferguson’s RRC newsletter published “Holtorf Resigns!! — Brita is Toxic.”

His resignation vacated the Vice-Chair position, making Andrews the senior officer below the Chair.

BH

Brita Horn

Current Chairwoman (elected by majority vote, March 2025)
Subject of Action

Succeeded Williams as Chair at the March 2025 reorganization. Connected to three parties in this network: Williams (whom she replaced), Holtorf (who resigned citing her), and Andrews (who issued the removal meeting call). Declared the February 21 meeting “invalid and without any legal authority.”

The bylaws require both the Chairman and Vice-Chairman to be “absent or unable to act” before the Secretary may call a meeting (Art. VII, §D(2)). Horn’s Declaration (Feb 2, 2026, Case 2025CV30292) states she was available and active in her role at the time Andrews issued the call.

JE

Jason Ensz

Saguache County Chair · SD-12 Vice-Chair · HD-62 Vice-Chair
Petition Circulator

Holds three simultaneous party offices. Williams sent the petition form directly to him on February 13 with instructions to “work with Anna to distribute it the entire membership via email” (Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c).

RG

Raymond Garcia

Chairman, Colorado Hispanic Republicans · Petition Sponsor
Petitioner

Collected 137 of 502 voting member signatures in October 2025, exceeding the 25% threshold (126, per Art. VII, §D(3)). The Executive Committee voted 14–8 that the petition was invalid — wrong form used. Garcia appealed to the full CRC, which has not yet heard his appeal. Andrews unilaterally declared the petition valid in February 2026. Also provides content to Restore REAL Colorado.

RRC

Restore REAL Colorado

Ferguson’s newsletter operation · restorerealcolorado.com / grassrootsconnect.us
Distribution Arm

Presents as an independent grassroots voice. Public domain records confirm Ferguson is the operator (EX-007 WHOIS). Distributed the removal petition to the full SCC membership. See Act III, Step 5 for the full distribution infrastructure and team roster.

Evan Morris (Vice-Chair, Garfield County GOP) — Andrews’ personal assistant and email editor. Maintains the Red Book on Andrews’ behalf, paid at “the TCFG rate” from Andrews’ private professional rate structure. Edited the “AIRING DIRTY LAUNDRY” drafts. Same county as Andrews.

Julie & Chuck Bonniwell — RRC content and media. Julie is a 3x Emmy journalist (KMGH-TV, KDVR Fox-31). Chuck is a former trial attorney and publisher. Co-hosts of the “Chuck and Julie Show” podcast. Provide the professional media production for RRC’s newsletter operation.

Cody LeBlanc, Bridget Hulcom, Jeremy Goodall — meeting operations team for the February 21 session.

Ferguson served as Secretary under Williams. When Williams’ administration ended, Andrews was elected to the same role Ferguson vacated. Andrews now coordinates with both Williams (former Chair) and Ferguson (former Secretary) to remove Horn (current Chair). Two of the three executive officers serving under Horn — Andrews (elected March 2025) and Holtorf (elected July 2025 to fill a vacancy) — are documented in contact with the previous administration regarding the removal effort.

ACT II

The Inheritance

March 2025. What was left behind.

On March 29, 2025, the Colorado Republican Party held its leadership election. Brita Horn was elected Chair. Russ Andrews was elected Secretary. Darrel Phelan was elected Vice-Chair. Dave Williams’ chairmanship ended. Phelan resigned in June 2025 after approximately 2.5 months. Richard Holtorf was elected to fill the vacancy in July 2025.

Between March 4 and April 1, the following events were recorded in the Google Workspace administrative audit logs.

In March 2025, the outgoing administration systematically deleted 200 GB of Colorado GOP workspace data — emails, documents, calendars — across 19 accounts. Access was delayed 20 days, exceeding Google's recovery window. The 60-Day Report documented this in full and is public record.

19
User accounts deleted
March–April 2025
9,252
File deletion events
OAuth (third-party access) clients
authorized for data migration
1 of 18
Active accounts
remaining (5.6%)

Nineteen user accounts deleted: personal accounts (Shana, jon, eric, darcy, liz, Patrick, anna, hope, greg, Tom) and organizational infrastructure (electionsecurity@cologop.org, Volunteer@cologop.org, mail@colo-gop.org). Deleted by three actors across two domains: dave@cologop.org (12 accounts on the original domain), dave@colo-gop.org (3 accounts after the domain transition), and info@colo-gop.org (2 accounts, including Williams’ own). When it was done, one account remained active out of eighteen: info@colo-gop.org.

The deletions occurred across four dates: three accounts on March 4, two on March 26, seven on March 30, then four more overnight into March 31 on the new colo-gop.org domain. The last deletion was April 1.

19 user accounts deleted (March 4 – April 1, 2025)
3 actors across 2 domains
DateTime (UTC)ActorDeleted Account
Mar 418:24:25dave@cologop.orgRSVP@cologop.org
Mar 418:30:20dave@cologop.orgtgood@cologop.org
Mar 419:00:23dave@cologop.orgShana@cologop.org
Mar 1006:00:562 additional deletions (user names not recorded in audit log)
Mar 2605:00:40dave@cologop.orgjon@cologop.org
Mar 2605:01:05dave@cologop.orgeric@cologop.org
Mar 3018:56:44dave@cologop.orgdarcy@cologop.org
Mar 3018:57:38dave@cologop.orgliz@cologop.org
Mar 3018:58:09dave@cologop.orgPatrick@cologop.org
Mar 3018:58:27dave@cologop.orgelectionsecurity@cologop.org
Mar 3018:58:47dave@cologop.orgVolunteer@cologop.org
Mar 3022:41:33dave@cologop.organna@cologop.org (Ferguson)
Mar 3022:42:20dave@cologop.orghope@cologop.org
Mar 3104:58:55dave@colo-gop.orggreg@colo-gop.org
Mar 3104:58:56dave@colo-gop.orgcrcas@colo-gop.org
Mar 3104:58:56dave@colo-gop.orgmail@colo-gop.org
Mar 3105:28:49info@colo-gop.orgdave@colo-gop.org
Apr 115:16:16info@colo-gop.orgTom@colo-gop.org

Note: 2 additional deletions on March 10 at 06:00:56 UTC (user names not recorded in audit log). Total: 19 accounts. All timestamps from Google Workspace audit logs. Source: EX-003, admin_all_events.json.

The deletion rate for Williams-related emails was significantly higher than the overall mailbox rate.

In Andrews' email account, 86% of Williams-related emails were deleted (12 of 14) — compared to 25% (~588 of 2,355) of the overall mailbox. Every one-on-one email between Andrews and Williams was gone. The two Williams emails that survived were both sent to multiple recipients. Seven of eight key coordination emails were deleted. The one that survived was sent to multiple recipients, including at least one copy outside Andrews’ account.

86%
Williams emails deleted
from Andrews' account
Key emails deleted
(one multi-recipient survived)
Draft versions of
"Dirty Laundry" email
~588
Total emails deleted
(25% of mailbox)

The emails documenting the coordination — the Official Call, the strategy correspondence, the "Dirty Laundry" email — were all removed. The emails remained in Google Vault under litigation hold. Each is cited by Gmail ID in Act III.

9,252 file deletion events by actor
5,388 delete + 3,864 trash
ActorDeleteTrashTotal%
info@cologop.org4,3623,3567,71883.4%
[Unknown/Empty]8563741,23013.3%
dave@cologop.org120972172.3%
dave@colo-gop.org4535800.9%
info@colo-gop.org213<0.1%
hope@cologop.org213<0.1%
anna@cologop.org101<0.1%

One account — info@cologop.org — was responsible for 83.4% of all file deletion events. The distinction between "delete" and "trash" reflects Google's two-stage removal: trashed files can sometimes be recovered, permanently deleted files cannot. Source: EX-003, drive_all_events.json.

On March 30, midway through the mass deletions, the workspace underwent a domain transition. The organization's primary domain shifted from cologop.org to colo-gop.org. All email accounts, settings, and administrative controls migrated to the new domain name.

The administrative actions were: admin role removed from info@cologop.org at 19:06 UTC. Primary admin transferred to dave@colo-gop.org at 19:55 UTC. Admin role assigned to info@colo-gop.org at 21:58 UTC. Primary admin transferred to info@colo-gop.org at 22:28 UTC. A six-hour gap separated the last action on the old domain from the first action on the new one. Then info@colo-gop.org deleted dave@colo-gop.org.

Domain transition: cologop.org → colo-gop.org (March 30–31)
6-hour gap, admin transfer
Time (UTC)ActorAction
Mar 30, 19:06:19dave@cologop.orgRemoves admin role from info@cologop.org
Mar 30, 19:55:58[System]Primary admin transfers to dave@colo-gop.org
Mar 30, 21:58:08dave@colo-gop.orgAssigns admin role to info@colo-gop.org
Mar 30, 22:28:40[System]Primary admin transfers to info@colo-gop.org

Last action on cologop.org: March 30, 22:42:20 UTC. First action on colo-gop.org: March 31, 04:58:55 UTC. Gap: 6 hours 16 minutes. info@colo-gop.org then deletes dave@colo-gop.org (March 31, 05:28:49). Source: EX-003, admin_all_events.json.

Before the mass deletions, on March 9–10, four OAuth clients — third-party applications granted access to Gmail data — were authorized for "Data Migration (New)" — Google's built-in tool for copying email data between systems. The authorization happened over an eight-hour window. Nineteen migration operations were recorded: 4 setup, 4 start, 3 report downloads. All authorized by dave@cologop.org.

Three of the four clients were granted full Gmail access: modify, insert, readonly, labels, compose. As of May 28, 2025, all four OAuth clients remained active with domain-wide delegation and Gmail scopes intact.

4 OAuth (third-party access) clients authorized for data migration (March 9–10)
8-hour window, 19 migration events
Time (UTC)Client IDScopes
Mar 9, 22:00:16105086952601182133832gmail.readonly
Mar 10, 05:09:55107586150225061477885gmail.modify, insert, readonly, labels, compose
Mar 10, 05:50:48115541521014676059253gmail.modify, insert, readonly, labels, compose
Mar 10, 06:01:47100927710833487081077gmail.modify, insert, readonly, labels, compose

19 migration operations recorded over 8 hours: 4 setup, 4 start, 3 report downloads. All authorized by dave@cologop.org. As of May 28, 2025, all 4 OAuth clients remained active with domain-wide delegation and Gmail scopes intact. Source: EX-003, token_all_events.json.

Google allows 20 days to restore deleted user accounts. After that, the accounts and their data are permanently gone.

The last account deletion occurred on April 1, 2025. Google's 20-day recovery window would expire on April 21. New leadership received workspace access on April 20 — day 20. One day before the window closed.

EventDateDays from Last Deletion
Last user deletion (Tom@colo-gop.org)April 1, 20250
Google 20-day recovery window expiresApril 21, 202520
Access provided to new leadershipApril 20, 2025Day 20
Examination screenshots takenMay 28, 202557
Analysis commencedJune 30, 202590

By the time the examination began: “Recently deleted users: No users match your current selection.” Recovery count: zero. One active user out of 18 licensed accounts. 5.6% utilization. The deleted accounts included electionsecurity@cologop.org, Volunteer@cologop.org, and mail@colo-gop.org.

This document exists because of a security review — a routine examination of the party’s Google Workspace infrastructure during the leadership transition.

How this data was obtained
Provenance

Discovery of residual access. During the workspace handover, incoming administrators discovered that data from the prior administration was missing and that the former chair’s Google Takeout export tooling remained connected to the party’s workspace. A recommendation was made to remove this tooling. The recommendation was not acted on at that time.

Second review and escalation. A subsequent review was requested. During that review, it was discovered that current party email accounts were being used to coordinate with the former chair — the same individual whose residual tooling had been flagged. This finding triggered a broader examination of the workspace's administrative logs, email records, and access patterns. The 60-Day Report documenting the original data deletion was already public record.

Preservation measures. Google Vault litigation holds were activated on party accounts during the investigation period. Vault holds are tracked by internal Google account identifiers, not email addresses — meaning that renaming, reassigning, or relabeling an account does not break the hold. All data subject to a hold is preserved regardless of user-level deletion.

Email access suspension. During the active security review, email access for the Secretary's account was temporarily suspended. This suspension occurred because the review had identified communications between the Secretary and the former chair conducted through party infrastructure. Access was subsequently restored. At the February 21 meeting, Andrews attributed the suspension to the Chairwoman without disclosing the underlying investigation.

Scope. Every data source cited in this document was obtained through authorized administrative access to party-owned systems (Google Workspace, Google Vault), publicly available records (TRACER, WHOIS, court filings, YouTube), or voter registration data (Colorado Secretary of State, EX-003). Emails from external senders (e.g., repdavewilliams@gmail.com) are cited because they were received by and stored in party accounts.

The emails were deleted from Andrews' inbox. They remained in Google Vault, where litigation holds had been activated during the security review. Each email cited in this briefing is reproduced with its original headers, timestamps, recipients, Gmail message ID, and content.

This is what the new leadership inherited: a workspace with 200 GB of deleted data across 19 accounts, a primary domain that had been transferred, OAuth (third-party access) tokens still connected, and a 20-day recovery window that was one day from expiring when access was granted. The 60-Day Report (public record) documented the deletions. The coordination that followed — documented in the next section — used the party’s own email accounts.

The Operation

Six steps. Fourteen days. Documented in the email record.

Between February 7 and February 16, 2026, six documented events occurred involving overlapping participants. The evidence for each is drawn from emails, audit logs, and public records — much of it deleted from party accounts but preserved through forensic extraction.

1

Garcia Collects Petition Signatures

October 2025

Raymond Garcia, Chairman of the Colorado Hispanic Republicans and member of the El Paso County Republican Party, files a recall petition under COGOP bylaws. He gathers 137 of 502 voting member signatures, exceeding the 25% threshold of 126 required to force a special meeting. The petition is submitted to the Executive Committee for verification.

In November, the Executive Committee votes 14–8 that the petition is invalid — wrong form used. Under the bylaws (Article VII, Section D.3), when a petition “has been challenged before the Executive Committee, the period for issuing the call shall be extended while the challenge is pending.” Garcia appeals to the full CRC. As of Horn’s Declaration (February 2, 2026, Case 2025CV30292), the CRC “has not yet heard his appeal.” The challenge remains pending.

The petition exists. The Executive Committee has ruled it insufficient. That ruling has not been overturned by the full CRC.

Petition details and EC ruling
ItemDetail
Petition sponsorRaymond Garcia
Signatures collected137 of 502 voting members
Threshold required (25%)126 signatures
EC vote14–8 ruling petition invalid (wrong form)
EC ruling dateNovember 2025
Appeal statusPending before full CRC (not yet heard)
Bylaws referenceArt. VII §D.3 — call period extended while challenge is pending
Source: Party records, EC minutes (November 2025) · Horn Declaration (Feb 2, 2026, Case 2025CV30292)
2

Andrews Reverses the Executive Committee

February 7, 2026

Months after the Executive Committee’s ruling, Secretary Russ Andrews unilaterally declares the petition valid, setting aside the EC’s determination. The bylaws do not specify a mechanism for a single officer to override the Executive Committee.

That evening, something unusual happens. At 4:19 PM MST, Andrews’ account is accessed via ProtonVPN — IP 205.147.22.13, ASN 208172 (Proton AG), Miami exit node. Google flags the login as suspicious and triggers a device prompt challenge, which is passed. Sixty-six seconds later, the account forwards the confidential Red Book — the party’s member directory containing names, roles, personal addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses for every SCC member — to aferg121@aol.com, Anna Ferguson’s old AOL address. The email bounces. The sender used her outdated Williams-era contact, not her current email.

This is the only VPN login in Andrews’ 28 recorded logins over 6 months. Every other login uses his Carbondale residential ISP (15 logins) or standard travel connections. The VPN appeared once, produced one action, and never appeared again. Three days later, Andrews logged in from Mexico — without a VPN.

Login activity and VPN analysis
DateLocationProviderNotes
Feb 7, 4:19 PMMiami, FL (exit node)ProtonVPN (Proton AG)IP 205.147.22.13 · ASN 208172 (Proton AG, confirmed). Google flagged is_suspicious: true. Device prompt challenge passed. 66 seconds later, account forwards confidential RedBook to aferg121@aol.com (Ferguson’s old AOL — bounced). The sender used her outdated Williams-era address.
Feb 10Puerto Vallarta, MXUNINET / TelmexMexican residential ISP. Andrews wrote on Feb 4: “My wife and I are headed to Mexico tomorrow.”
Feb 12Puerto Vallarta, MXUNINET / TelmexSecond Mexico login, 2 days later. No VPN used.

The 66-second action: At 4:19:03 PM MST, the ProtonVPN login occurs. At 4:20:09 PM — 66 seconds later — the account forwards the party’s confidential RedBook (member directory) to aferg121@aol.com, Anna Ferguson’s old AOL address. The email bounces (address not found). Ferguson’s current email is a Comcast address. Whoever sent this knew Ferguson from the Williams era but did not have her updated contact information.

Context: The next morning (Feb 8, 1:42 PM), Andrews sends the Official Call to the full SCC. That evening, when SCC member John Fielding asks procedural questions, Williams responds: “Russ is traveling so his response may be delayed a bit.” Williams already knew Andrews’ travel plans before the membership did. Either Andrews used a privacy tool he has never used before or since, forwarded party data to a Williams ally using an outdated address, and then had Williams speak for him the next day — or a third party with Andrews’ credentials accessed his account through a service designed to conceal identity and location. [Inference — two interpretations consistent with the audit data; neither confirmed]

Source: EX-004, logins_all_20260216_203343.json · EX-001, 2026-02-04_andrews_forwards_bounce_to_williams.html
3

Andrews Issues the Call

February 8, 2026

Andrews sends what he titles an “Official Call” for February 21 to the full SCC membership — addressed to himself, with all recipients BCC’d so no member can see who else received it. Williams is CC’d on the thread.

When a member asks procedural questions, Williams replies on Andrews’ behalf: “Russ is traveling.” Williams describes which items are being tabled, why, and the strategic intent behind the no-confidence vote — a level of detail consistent with involvement in designing the agenda [Inference]. He characterizes the confidence vote as “symbolic.”

When John Fielding pushes back asking for an “official” position, Williams concedes: “That’s fair” — acknowledging Fielding’s point.

The entire thread was deleted from Andrews’ account.

The four agenda items
  1. Suspend the $2.4M spending authority adopted by Horn, furlough all personnel compensation and benefits until the CRC fundraises 4 months’ worth of expenses
  2. Bylaw amendment: Strike and remove all language allowing online CRC meetings (except Executive Committee), require in-person or hybrid for votes
  3. Cease all legal action in Case 2025CV30292, including fee recovery and sanctions
  4. No confidence vote: “Does the membership of the CRC have confidence in the continued leadership of Brita Horn?”

Andrews himself acknowledges in the email that the recall/replacement question “will need to be tabled to the next regularly scheduled meeting as 30-day’s notice has not been provided.” But his own agenda item #2 — the bylaw amendment — also requires 30-day notice under Article VII, Section E and Article XX, Section A. He proceeds with it anyway.

Williams responds with insider knowledge
“From what I understand about the situation, the bylaws are being tabled because 30 days wasn’t provided in this notice which is a requirement.”
Dave Williams, Feb 8, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c3f96dfbcef75f
“As to the ‘no confidence’ vote, it was intended by Ray Garcia (petition sponsor) to not be a removal vote so the expectation is simple majority and that it would more or less be symbolic.”
Dave Williams, Feb 8, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c3fa7d158e5909

Williams’ CC list on this thread exposes the full coordination network: Anna Ferguson (aferg121@comcast.net — petition form creator), Steven A. Klenda (sklenda@klendalegal.com — CRC’s retained attorney representing Horn in Case 2025CV30292; CC’d here in his capacity as party counsel), Restore REAL Colorado (info@restorerealcolorado.com — Ferguson’s website, confirmed via public domain records), plus connected individuals Ted Harvey, Robin Webb, David DiCarlo, Dave Gill, and others.

Agenda item #3 — “cease all legal action” in Case 2025CV30292 — would directly benefit Williams’ allies on this CC list. Ferguson was co-plaintiff (case since dismissed). Harvey, Webb, DiCarlo, and others are aligned with the Williams faction. Klenda, by contrast, is the CRC’s attorney prosecuting that case — dropping it would terminate his engagement. Andrews later threatened exactly this: “my very first phone call will be to Steve Klenda… I will tell him that I am starting at $0.00.”

Eight bylaws violations in the call

The call contains eight distinct bylaws violations spanning call authority, petition validity, notice requirements, format selection, amendment procedure, and the proxy ban. The most critical: the Secretary has no authority to call a meeting while the Chair is present and able (Art. VII §D.2), and the EC already ruled the petition invalid (Art. VII §D.3).

See Act V: The Violations for the complete enumeration with citations.

Source: EX-001 (Gmail ID: 19c3f02877a064ad, deleted, recovered from Vault) · COGOP Bylaws Art. V §C.2, Art. VII §§D.2, D.3, E, G, Art. XX §A
4

Williams Directs the Petition

February 13, 2026 at 4:55 PM MST

Four principals — Williams, Andrews, Ferguson, and Ensz — on one thread. Williams directing the operation. Each participant assigned a specific role. Seven of eight key coordination emails were deleted from party accounts. This one was sent to multiple recipients, and at least one copy remained in Google Vault.

“Please see the attached pdf petition form that was created during the last administration and used by the current one back in July of 2025.”
Dave Williams, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c
“To make it easier, Anna put the question of removal on the form for you so you can get going as soon as you’d like to.”
Dave Williams, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c
“Also, please see the URL link to an online form that will allow members to add their name electronically, which is permissible with this form.”
Dave Williams, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c
“Assuming Russ approves this petition form and process, I encourage you to work with Anna to distribute it the entire membership via email.”
Dave Williams, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c
“Best of luck. I’ll sign it whenever you put it forward.”
Dave Williams, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c

Williams provides the petition form and identifies it as infrastructure from his former chairmanship. Ferguson has already customized it with the removal question. A Google Form for electronic signatures has already been built (forms.gle/bhS9JJg29LufWWf38). Williams assigns roles: Ensz circulates, Ferguson distributes, Andrews approves. He closes with: “I’ll sign it whenever you put it forward.”

At the time of this email, the form has already been customized, the Google Form has already been built, and the distribution plan has already been set. Andrews’ approval is referenced as a future step, but the operational infrastructure was in place before he acted. The email was sent from repdavewilliams@gmail.com — a personal Gmail account, not a party address. The recipients were on party accounts subject to Google Vault litigation holds. The email is reproduced above with its Gmail message ID.

Full email metadata and role analysis
FieldValue
Gmail ID19c596edd3510e5c
Fromrepdavewilliams@gmail.com (Dave Williams)
ToJason Ensz
CCRuss Andrews, Anna Ferguson
DateFebruary 13, 2026 at 4:55 PM MST (18:55:51 -0500 EST)
StatusActive (not deleted — multi-recipient)

Role assignment in this single email:

  • Williams — Provides the form, provides the Google Form link, directs distribution, assigns roles.
  • Ferguson — Customizes the petition form with the removal question. Creates infrastructure before the email is even sent.
  • Andrews — Approval authority. “Assuming Russ approves this petition form and process.”
  • Ensz — Distribution. “I encourage you to work with Anna to distribute it the entire membership via email.”
Source: EX-001 (active, not deleted) · Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c · From: repdavewilliams@gmail.com · To: Ensz · CC: Andrews, Ferguson

Context: Three months earlier

“Jeff Hurd’s Ch of Staff […] Called me and asked that we postpone tonight’s meeting. Apparently our congressional delegation met with DW and Susie Wiles before DW was appointed. They negotiated/agreed that if he got the job he would be prohibited from participating in CO politics in any way, shape or form. The White House has initiated an Inspector General investigation into DW, and our congressional delegation fears that if we interact with the toilet bug that we could have our own legal issues. I will NOT be on the call tonight.”
Andrews to party leadership, November 17, 2025 [Reported — Andrews’ account of information from Rep. Jeff Hurd’s office]

On November 17, Andrews refused to join a call because of the legal risk of interacting with Williams. He referred to Williams as “the toilet bug.” Eighty-eight days later, he was executing Williams’ petition plan.

5

Red Book Distribution

February 15, 2026

Andrews sends “Meeting to Proceed” to approximately 450 BCC recipients (per sent folder analysis) confirming the meeting. The same day, Ferguson’s newsletter (Restore REAL Colorado) distributes the petition form to the same audience. Both distributions were deleted from Andrews’ account.

To distribute a petition to “the entire membership via email” (Williams’ instruction in Step 4), Ferguson needs the membership email list. That list is the Red Book — the party’s confidential internal directory containing names, roles, personal addresses, personal phone numbers, and personal email addresses for every SCC member, state legislator, district attorney, and county party officer statewide. It is not a public document.

The Red Book forwarding chain

Andrews, as Secretary, is custodian of the Red Book. He had been responsible for keeping it current since spring 2025 and had not been updating it. When Horn directed him to update it on February 3, he immediately forwarded the task to someone else.

Evan Morris is the Vice-Chairman of the Garfield County Republican Party and a personal ally of Andrews. Andrews outsources Red Book maintenance to Morris and pays him privately at the “TCFG rate” — the pay scale from The Certus Financial Group, the wealth management company where Andrews works.

DateAction
Dec 10, 2025Andrews forwards the Red Book to Evan Morris — a county vice-chair with no role in maintaining the state directory
Feb 3, 2026Horn directs Andrews to update the Red Book. Andrews forwards the directive — including raw contact data in plaintext (legislators’ personal emails, personal phone numbers, home addresses) — to Morris, asking: “Evan, can you pls update the Redbook by 5 pm with the below entries? I’ll pay you the going TCFG rate.”
Feb 7Morris sends his updated version back to Andrews
Feb 7 (4:19 PM)Andrews’ account (via ProtonVPN) forwards the Red Book to Ferguson’s old AOL address. Bounced.
Feb 10Andrews emails all 64 county chairs requesting updated officer lists with “email addresses and cell phone numbers”
“I kindly request that you provide an updated list of your county officers and bonus members (if applicable), including their email addresses and cell phone numbers as soon as possible.”
Andrews to all county chairs, Feb 10, 2026 · EX-001
“I still need to confirm that my Redbook is complete for any future meetings.”
Andrews to Summit County chair, Feb 11, 2026 · EX-001
“I would appreciate if you could send me your current list of executive officers and bonus members to ensure my Redbook is complete.”
Andrews to Douglas County chair, Feb 11, 2026 · EX-001
Source: EX-001 (Red Book forwarding chain: Dec 10, Jan 2, Feb 3, Feb 7) · EX-007 (WHOIS captures)
Ferguson’s distribution channel: Restore REAL Colorado

Restore REAL Colorado (RRC) presents itself as an independent grassroots voice. Public domain registration records show an alias domain — grassrootsconnect.us — resolves to the same server IP address and nameservers as restorerealcolorado.com. That domain’s registration is not privacy-protected: it is registered to Anna Ferguson, the former Secretary of the Williams administration, who was also co-plaintiff in the now-dismissed Ferguson v. Horn/Bremer lawsuit. She registered it in September 2024 — weeks after the Williams administration ended.

The newsletter’s documented contributors:

  • Anna Ferguson — Founder and operator. Former COGOP Secretary under Williams.
  • Julie Hayden (Julie Bonniwell) — Content contributor. Three-time Emmy journalist, 30+ years at KMGH-TV and KDVR Fox-31. Co-host of the “Chuck and Julie Show” podcast.
  • Chuck Bonniwell — Associated media. Former trial attorney, publisher of the Glendale Cherry Creek Chronicle. Co-host of the “Chuck and Julie Show.”
  • Lorie Smith — Web designer. Built the RRC website infrastructure (303creative.com).
  • Raymond Garcia — Content source. Also the petition sponsor whose petition this entire operation is built around.
  • Cathy Cheatham — Distribution relay. Delta County Republican Party bonus member.

The same network also publishes “RINO Watch” — a list identifying party members the authors consider insufficiently conservative. On December 11, 2025, Andrews emailed Morris a link to the RINO Watch list with the subject line: “Congrats on making RINO Watch.” Andrews is aware of and connected to this media operation.

The distribution infrastructure works like this: Williams directs the operation (Step 4). Andrews provides the membership contact list from the Red Book. Ferguson distributes via RRC to the full membership. The Bonniwells provide professional media production through their podcast and publishing network. The petition reaches the same ~450 members (per sent folder analysis) through both Andrews’ official BCC emails and Ferguson’s “independent” newsletter — on the same day.

Source: EX-007 (WHOIS captures, domain registration records) · Website “About” page (lorie@303creative.com)
6

Andrews Reveals the Strategy

February 13–16, 2026

Between February 13 and 16, Andrews sent a series of emails that describe the parties involved, the replacement candidate, the timeline, and his personal role. All were deleted from his account and recovered from Google Vault.

“The no-confidence vote is a test vote to determine if we should go through with a recall, probably the morning of the Assembly.”
Andrews, Feb 16, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c6759c6e7c3353 · Deleted from account

Andrews describes the Feb 21 meeting as a “test vote” to gauge whether a full removal at the Assembly is viable.

“The Davidians, Richard, and I have encouraged Danielle Jurinsky to run to replace Brita. She has accepted.”
Andrews, Feb 16, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c6759c6e7c3353 · EX-001 (deleted, recovered from Vault)

“The Davidians” is Andrews’ own term for Williams’ faction. “Richard” is Rep. Richard Holtorf. The Chair hasn’t been removed yet — the vote hasn’t happened — but the replacement candidate has already been recruited and has accepted. The sequence is documented in Andrews’ own words.

Full correspondence and resignation pattern
“Brita’s goals are vitriol, hatred of people she disagrees with, disruption, attack, and lawfare.”
Andrews, Feb 16, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c671404d1890bb
“If I fail at this vital initiative, I will complete the Assembly, file my paperwork with the SOS, then resign, pending being reimbursed for the approx $10,000 in out-of-pocket travel expenses, which will climb to some $12,000 after the Assembly.”
Andrews, Feb 16, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c671404d1890bb

The same phrase — resign if I fail, nominate me if I succeed — appeared in three emails to different recipients over three days. On the same night as the first, he sent the opposite message to a critic:

On February 13 — the same night Williams sent the petition email (Step 4) — the Teller County Republican Central Committee sent Andrews a formal cease-and-desist calling his Official Call “unauthorized” and “violating multiple bylaws,” demanding he “cease and desist from this effort” or resign. Andrews sent two responses within one hour:

“Thanks for your shallow and uninformed comments. I took them under consideration and filed them appropriately. I will resign NEVER.”
Andrews to Erik Stone (Teller Co. Secretary), Feb 13, 2026 — 10:19 PM · Gmail ID: 19c5a60465cdad8f
“Please say hello to Brita for me as her superior leadership has guided her to box both me and Richard Holtorf out for two months.”
Andrews to Stone, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c5a60465cdad8f
“Maybe you should scratch her attorney a check for $141k to make both of them go away.”
Andrews to Stone, Feb 13, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c5a60465cdad8f

Then, fifty-eight minutes later, to a different Teller County member who had defended him:

“If I fail, I will happily resign. If I succeed in uniting this bizarre party, then I expect you to nominate me for the Presidential Medal of Freedom.”
Andrews to Terry Porter, Feb 13, 2026 — 11:17 PM · Gmail ID: 19c5a94ce8d5997b

Three days later, the same line a third time:

“If I succeed in uniting this shitshow, I need you to nominate me for the Presidential Medal of Freedom!”
Andrews, Feb 16, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c6759c6e7c3353

“I will resign NEVER” to a critic. “I will happily resign” to a supporter. Within the same hour. Both emails were deleted from his account. The “Presidential Medal of Freedom” line appears word-for-word in all three emails. The only variation is “bizarre party” vs. “shitshow” depending on the recipient.

Source: EX-001 (all deleted, recovered from Vault) · Gmail IDs: 19c671404d1890bb, 19c6759c6e7c3353, 19c5a60465cdad8f, 19c5a94ce8d5997b

Richard Holtorf — Five Months Inside

Vice-Chair Richard Holtorf maintained concurrent communication with Williams over a five-month period while serving in Horn’s executive team. The email record documents the progression of this relationship and the timing of his resignation relative to the removal effort.

7
Williams emails in account
726
Total emails examined
5
Months of concurrent contact
2nd
Vice-Chair to resign under Horn
Phase 1: Concurrent Contact (Sep–Nov 2025)

Sep 25–26: Andrews ghostwrites Horn’s “olive branch” speech for the upcoming SCC meeting. He sends it to Evan Morris for editing, then distributes the final “OLIVE BRANCH SPEECH” to Horn, Holtorf, and Alec Hanna. Horn delivers it with the parenthetical “(Russ’ words).” That same evening, Holtorf separately forwards Horn’s internal lawsuit memo to a third party for redistribution to SCC members without Horn’s knowledge.

Andrews to Morris, Sep 26, 2025 · Subject: “Brita’s speech. Don’t kill yourself, but PLEASE work your magic, Evan!” · Gmail ID: 19987eb10532174a · EX-001

Oct 2: Horn asks Holtorf to share screenshots of his Williams conversations. Holtorf refuses:

“You have a big ask of me in requesting disclosure of my personal conversations with my former legislative colleague with potential unintended consequences for me.”
Holtorf to Horn, Oct 2, 2025 · Gmail ID: 199a54a7b36ff4fe
“It is un-prudent for me to share these exchanges with you or anyone else involved in any type of litigation. These text exchanges may be used in litigation and could cause me unintended legal exposure.”
Holtorf to Horn, Oct 2, 2025 · Gmail ID: 199a54a7b36ff4fe
“I spoke with Russ Andrews about your request yesterday and he mentioned it was an unusual request.”
Holtorf to Horn, Oct 2, 2025 · Gmail ID: 199a54a7b36ff4fe

He confirms the Williams texts exist, confirms he discussed Horn’s request with Andrews, and cites legal counsel advising him to retain them.

Oct 1: Even the CRC’s retained attorney warned against Holtorf’s Williams contact:

“Uh, Huh? Dave Williams has sued us. Part of this lawsuit remains active. And we are talking to him? For the love of common sense, PLEASE STOP. FULL STOP.”
Steven Klenda to Horn & Holtorf, Oct 1, 2025 · Gmail ID: 199a105f27bc3f90 · EX-002

Nov 17–19: Seven weeks after the CRC attorney’s cease-contact directive, Holtorf attends a meeting at JeffCo GOP HQ organized by Williams. Attendees: Williams, Ferguson, Chuck Bonniwell, Rich Wyatt — all four would later participate in the Feb 21 operation. Holtorf reports back to Horn:

“I attended the meeting with Rich Wyatt, Chuck Bonniwell, Anna Ferguson, and Dave Williams as an individual citizen last night.”
Holtorf to Horn, Nov 19, 2025 · Gmail ID: 19a99f49115d0585
“There is a growing movement against us as a leadership team and this problem is not going away until the underlying issues are addressed in a positive manner.”
Holtorf to Horn, Nov 19, 2025 · Gmail ID: 19a99f49115d0585

He held the CRC Vice-Chair position at the time. His draft resignation followed 11 weeks later.

Source: EX-001 / EX-002 (Andrews + Holtorf mailbox exports) · Gmail IDs: 199a54a7b36ff4fe, 19a8e03f95c0972b, 19a99f49115d0585
Phase 2: The Arnold Thread (Aug–Sep 2025)

Holtorf initiated a private correspondence with Matthew Arnold (arnoldm@clawllc.org) regarding case indemnification. Arnold represented the Investigative Committee — Williams’ side of the litigation.

DateDirectionContent
Aug 22Arnold → HoltorfDemanded party indemnification — the party’s obligation to cover legal defense costs
Aug 23Holtorf → Arnold“A true patriot and ‘Republican minded’ lawyer who really cared about this state would offer his services pro bono.”
Aug 24Andrews → Holtorf“I TOTALLY AGREE!” (re: Holtorf’s message to Arnold)
Aug 26Holtorf → Arnold“I will see if I can persuade the Chairwoman to drop the legal challenge and put an end to all of this.”
Aug 27Holtorf → Arnold“Understand, I will not forward your correspondence to anyone else.”
Sep 4Holtorf → HornForwarded Arnold’s response despite promising not to share: “Below is the email response he sent me.”

Holtorf promised Arnold confidentiality (“I will not forward your correspondence”), then forwarded it to Horn 8 days later. Arnold initiated the exchange; Holtorf continued it — sending three replies over five days — while serving as Horn’s Vice-Chair. Andrews endorsed Holtorf’s position (“I TOTALLY AGREE!”).

Phase 3: The Coordinated Exit (Jan–Feb 2026)

Jan 20: Last public support for Horn. In the delegate allocation email thread, Holtorf backed Horn’s position:

“I fully agree with the Chair’s comments and her decision on the delegate count for state assembly. More is not always better.”
Holtorf to Hope Scheppelman, Jan 20, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19bdbd7c64627827

Williams responded the same day. Holtorf replied warmly: “Dave, Thanks for your commentary as I always appreciate a different perspective than my own.” Two weeks later, he resigned.

Feb 3: At 1:51 PM MST, Holtorf sends Andrews his draft resignation letter:

“Russ, FYI, Please review my letter. Any input would be appreciated. Rich”
Holtorf to Andrews, Feb 3, 2026 · Gmail ID: 19c250ffee948484 · Deleted from Andrews’ account · EX-002

20 minutes later (2:11 PM), Holtorf sent the official version to Horn, Andrews, and Alec Hanna.

Feb 4 (8:58 AM): Ferguson’s Restore REAL Colorado publishes “Holtorf Resigns!! — Brita is Toxic.” Less than 18 hours after it was sent to Horn. Andrews forwarded the article to four recipients within three hours:

TimeRecipientRoleAndrews’ note
9:45 AM[Congressional staff]US House staff“BLOWBACK”
10:25 AMJohn Temple, Arapahoe County ChairCounty party leader
10:43 AMErnest Luning (eluning@mac.com)Journalist
11:59 AMRichard HoltorfThe subject himself

Sequence: Holtorf sends draft to Andrews (1:51 PM) → official version to Horn (2:11 PM) → Ferguson publishes on RRC (next morning, 8:58 AM) → Andrews forwards the RRC article to journalists, congressional staff, and county chairs.

Feb 8: Despite his “resignation,” Holtorf sends Andrews a TurboScan document re: “SCC call — Feb 21, 2026” (CC: Rich Wyatt). Williams’ CC list on the Feb 8 response to John Fielding includes holtorfforcolorado@gmail.com alongside Ferguson, Klenda, and Restore REAL Colorado — confirming Holtorf was on the operational distribution list.

Procedural effect: With the Vice-Chair position vacant, Andrews became the senior officer below the Chair. The bylaws allow the Secretary to call meetings “in the event when both Chairman and Vice-Chairman are absent or unable to act” (Art. VII, §D(2)). Andrews issued the meeting call five days after Holtorf’s resignation.

Source: EX-001 / EX-002 (mailbox exports) · EX-005 (Red Book roster) · EX-006 (controversy filings)

The Deletion Pattern

The selective deletion pattern documented in Act II is concentrated on the coordination evidence. What follows is the specific email inventory — which messages were deleted, and which survived.

Deletion analysis: Andrews account
DateSubjectStatusContent
Jan 22“Fucking Brita!”DeletedSent to Morris only; critical of Horn
Feb 4Bounce forward to WilliamsDeletedDirect email from Andrews to Williams
Feb 8Official Call — SCC MeetingDeletedMeeting call issued by Secretary; Williams CC’d
Feb 8Williams answers for AndrewsDeletedWilliams responds with insider agenda knowledge; CCs Ferguson, Klenda, RRC, Harvey
Feb 11“AIRING DIRTY LAUNDRY”DeletedAdvocacy email to full SCC; 6 drafts; unverified claims
Feb 13Williams petition to EnszActiveIncludes Williams, Andrews, Ferguson, Ensz — the one that survived
Feb 15“Meeting to Proceed”Deleted~450 BCC recipients (4 batches); confirms meeting
Feb 16Strategy correspondenceDeletedAndrews discusses strategy, replacement candidate, and personal role

Every email where Andrews and Williams communicated directly was deleted. The one email that survived — the Williams petition email to Ensz — was sent to multiple recipients, and at least one copy was outside Andrews’ control.

The workspace destruction is documented in Act II: The Inheritance — 19 accounts deleted, 9,252 file deletion events, new leadership received access on day 20 of Google’s 20-day recovery window.

2024 Comparison: Williams Removal

A similar removal attempt was made on July 27, 2024. Williams himself was the target. That attempt was invalidated by Judge Eric Bentley for procedural deficiencies (Case 2024CV31638). The current attempt follows the same path with additional procedural issues. See Act V: The Precedent for the full side-by-side comparison.

Coordination Network

Interactive Network Map

March 2025 — February 2026

Two examination periods shown as a single continuum. The Workspace audit covers the March–April 2025 transition. The email examination covers August 2025 through February 2026.

March 2025: Workspace Activity

March 4, 2025
Initial account deletions (3 accounts). dave@cologop.org deletes RSVP, tgood, Shana accounts.
March 9–10, 2025
OAuth authorization + data migration. 4 OAuth clients authorized for “Data Migration (New)” with full Gmail access. 19 migration operations over 8 hours.
March 26, 2025
Second wave deletions (2 accounts). dave@cologop.org deletes jon, eric accounts.
March 29, 2025
Leadership election. Brita Horn elected Chair. Andrews elected Secretary. Darrel Phelan elected Vice-Chair. Williams’ chairmanship ends.
March 30–31, 2025
11 accounts deleted across two days. dave@cologop.org deletes 7 accounts on March 30 including electionsecurity@, Volunteer@, anna@ (Ferguson). Four more deleted overnight on new colo-gop.org domain.
March 31 – April 1
Final deletions on new domain. dave@colo-gop.org deletes 3 accounts. Last deletion: Tom@colo-gop.org.
April 20, 2025
Access provided to new leadership on day 20 of Google’s recovery window. Zero accounts recoverable.
June 2025
Vice-Chair Darrel Phelan resigns after ~2.5 months. First Vice-Chair to leave under Horn.
July 2025
Richard Holtorf elected Vice-Chair to fill Phelan vacancy.

August–November 2025: Andrews Account Activity

August 8, 2025
Andrews–Horn relationship deteriorates.
October 2025
Garcia submits recall petition (137 signatures of 502 voting members; 25% threshold: 126).
November 17, 2025
Andrews reports IG investigation. Texts party leadership that the congressional delegation warned against interacting with Williams: “prohibited from participating in CO politics in any way, shape or form.” Refers to Williams as “the toilet bug.” Refuses to join a call that evening.
November 20, 2025
Executive Committee rules petition insufficient (14–8). Wrong form used. Under bylaws Art. VII D.3, the call period is extended while the challenge is pending.

January–February 2026: The Operation

January 22, 2026
Andrews emails Morris re: Horn. Deleted.
January 26–30, 2026
Andrews corresponds with Williams faction members: “I have gotten to know many of the Davidians… we have WAY more in common than we don’t.”
February 3, 2026
Holtorf sends Andrews his draft resignation for review. Andrews deletes this email. 20 minutes later, Holtorf sends official version to Horn. Within 18 hours, RRC publishes “Holtorf Resigns!!”
February 4, 2026
Andrews forwards bounce email to Williams. Deleted.
February 7, 2026
Andrews reverses EC ruling. ProtonVPN login at 4:19 PM (only VPN login in 6 months). 66 seconds later, Red Book forwarded to Ferguson’s old AOL address (bounced). IP 205.147.22.13, ASN 208172/Proton AG, Miami exit node.
February 8, 2026
Andrews issues “Official Call” at 1:42 PM. All recipients BCC’d. Williams CC’d. Williams responds to John Fielding with insider knowledge. Entire thread deleted.
February 10–12, 2026
Account accessed from Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. Two logins from UNINET/Telmex (no VPN used).
February 11, 2026
“AIRING DIRTY LAUNDRY” email to full SCC. 6 draft versions found. All deleted.
February 13, 2026
Williams sends petition form to Ensz (CC: Andrews, Ferguson). “Anna put the question of removal on the form for you.” Gmail ID: 19c596edd3510e5c. The one email that survived.
February 15, 2026
“Meeting to Proceed” sent to ~450 BCC recipients. RRC distributes petition form the same day. Deleted.
February 16, 2026
Andrews discloses strategy in correspondence: “The Davidians, Richard, and I have encouraged Danielle Jurinsky to run to replace Brita.” Replacement candidate recruited before the vote. Deleted.
February 18, 2026
Ferguson identified as RRC operator via public WHOIS records. grassrootsconnect.us registered to username afergie121.
Mid-February 2026
Security review discovers coordination. Andrews’ email access temporarily suspended. Google Vault litigation holds activated.
February 21, 2026
Special meeting held. Andrews chairs, appoints all committee positions. Three measures pass 90–94%. Legal authority in dispute.
ACT IV

The Show

February 21, 2026. The Colorado Republican State Central Committee convenes.

246
Members Credentialed
600+
Person-Hours Spent
0
Binding Outcomes

On February 21, 2026, members of the Colorado Republican State Central Committee held a special meeting to vote on three measures against Chairwoman Brita Horn: suspending her spending authority, ceasing party litigation, and a motion of no confidence calling for her resignation. All three passed with 90–94% support from those voting.

246 members were credentialed for a two-hour meeting. The organizing team tested the Zoom infrastructure daily for two weeks. A petition was circulated statewide. A YouTube live stream was set up independently from official party channels. The resulting no-confidence vote has no provision in the bylaws. The spending vote invoked authority that belongs to a different body. Removal was not attempted — it requires 302 votes and only 246 were present.

One member stated on the record:

“In a sense this vote is symbolic.” — John Fielding, SCC Member • Source: YouTube (CB Strategic Consulting, Feb 21, 2026)

The meeting was called by Secretary Russ Andrews under Article VII, Section D(3) of the COGOP bylaws, which allows a special meeting upon written request of one-quarter of voting members. Andrews also chaired the meeting. It was held over Zoom — not on the official COGOP Zoom account, but on infrastructure provided by an entity called CB Strategic Consulting. The meeting was live-streamed on YouTube (2:09:29 runtime).

Andrews appointed every operational role for the meeting.

Operational Org Chart
RUSS ANDREWS — Secretary / Acting Chairman
├—— CODY LEBLANC — Teller Committee Chair
│   ├—— Controlled all polls (launch, timing, close)
│   ├—— Controlled all muting/unmuting
│   ├—— Operated YouTube live stream (CB Strategic)
│   └—— 2 weeks daily testing (3-6 sessions/day)
├—— BRIDGET HULCOM — Credentials Committee Chair
│   ├—— Controlled who was credentialed
│   ├—— Managed waiting room admissions
│   └—— Phone: 970-371-7598 (shared publicly)
├—— JEREMY GOODALL — Parliamentarian / Temporary Chair
│   ├—— Ruled on procedural questions
│   ├—— Took over chair during Andrews' speech
│   └—— Corrected procedural errors (motions out of order, debate time)
└—— ANNA FERGUSON — Recording / Chat Management
    ├—— Managed Zoom chat
    ├—— Recorded meeting (NOT taking formal minutes)
    └—— Operator of Restore REAL Colorado

During his six-minute speech, Andrews handed the gavel to Goodall as Chairman Pro Tem. When Andrews finished and asked for the gavel back, Goodall declined, stating it was “more appropriate for me to conduct business from this point on.” Goodall chaired for approximately 23 minutes before eventually returning control to Andrews for the final credentials vote and adjournment. All four operational roles were held by people Andrews appointed.

Single Officer, Multiple Roles

The person who verified the petition, called the meeting, chaired the meeting, appointed all committee positions, and delivered the speech arguing against the Chair was the same person: Russ Andrews.

Five people ran the meeting. All were appointed by Andrews.

Russ Andrews
Meeting Chair
Secretary & Acting Chairman. Holds both Secretary and Treasurer offices.
Full Profile

What he did at the meeting: Chaired the meeting. Appointed all committee positions (LeBlanc, Hulcom, Goodall, Ferguson). Seconded the amendment calling for Horn’s resignation. Delivered a roughly six-minute speech making the case against Horn’s leadership, handing the gavel to Goodall temporarily. When Andrews asked for the gavel back, Goodall declined, chairing for approximately 23 minutes before eventually returning control to Andrews for the final credentials vote and adjournment.

What he told the body: During his speech, Andrews made several claims about Horn’s leadership. He said Rep. Lauren Boebert asked him to help Horn make fundraising cold calls and that Horn refused the assistance [Unverified — Andrews’ statement at meeting, no independent corroboration]. He said Congressman Jeff Crank organized a Zoom with Colorado’s congressional representatives to pressure Horn on fundraising [Unverified — Andrews’ statement at meeting, no independent corroboration]. He said Horn agreed to raise $75,000 in December and fell far short.

The email issue: Andrews told the body that Horn disabled his and Holtorf’s COGOP email accounts: “I work four to six hours a day, seven days a week on this job. And she had disabled both mine and Richard Holtorf’s emails.” He said he contacted congressional offices to get them restored. The email suspension occurred during an active security review of the party’s Google Workspace (see Act II: Provenance). Access was subsequently restored.

Prior activity: His coordination with Williams and the deletion pattern are documented in Act II and Act III.

Connected to: Dave Williams, Lauren Boebert, Jeff Crank, Richard Holtorf

Cody LeBlanc
Teller Committee Chair
CB Strategic Consulting. Boulder County GOP. No formal parliamentarian training documented.
Full Profile

What he did at the meeting: Ran all of the technology. Launched and closed every poll. Muted and unmuted participants. Managed the YouTube live stream through CB Strategic Consulting. After the meeting ended, the stream kept running — broadcasting a private strategy discussion — until another participant asked him to shut it off.

Preparation: LeBlanc stated on the record that his team tested the Zoom setup “every day, three, four, five, six times a day” for two weeks before the meeting.

Background: Registered Agent for the Boulder County Republican Committee. Appears in court records related to Case 2025CV30292.

Connected to: Bridget Hulcom, CB Strategic Consulting, Boulder County GOP

Bridget Hulcom
Credentials Committee Chair
Not a voting member of the SCC. Brought in specifically for this role.
Full Profile

What she did at the meeting: Decided who was allowed to vote. Managed the credentialing spreadsheet, verified members entering the Zoom waiting room, and delivered the final credentials count to the body: 246 credentialed out of 502 eligible. She is not an elected member of the SCC — she was brought in specifically for this role.

Connected to: Cody LeBlanc

Jeremy Goodall
Parliamentarian
El Paso County GOP. Temporary Chair during Andrews' speech.
Full Profile

What he did at the meeting: Ruled on procedural questions. Temporarily chaired the meeting while Andrews gave his speech. Corrected multiple procedural errors (motions out of order, debate time). Andrews appointed him as parliamentarian; other members referred to his temporary presiding role as “Chairman Pro Tem.”

Connected to: El Paso County GOP

Anna Ferguson
Recording Secretary
Chat Manager. Restore REAL Colorado Operator. Former COGOP Secretary under Williams.
Full Profile

What she did at the meeting: Recorded the meeting and managed the Zoom chat. She stated on the record that she was not taking formal minutes:

“I haven’t been writing down the motion. I have it. I don’t know why anybody thinks that I’m taking any notes. I’m just recording a call.” — Anna Ferguson • Source: YouTube (CB Strategic Consulting, Feb 21, 2026)

Background: Former COGOP Secretary under Dave Williams. Runs the website Restore REAL Colorado (restorerealcolorado.com). Co-plaintiff in the El Paso County case against Horn. Before this meeting, she forwarded Andrews’ petition email to at least 8 recipients within hours of receiving it.

Connected to: Restore REAL Colorado

The February 21 meeting followed a sequence where each step depended on the one before it. Some of these steps used legitimate bylaws mechanisms. Others are disputed. And some of the legitimate steps were carried out by a single person who held conflicting roles.

Step 1: The Petition

What the bylaws say: One-quarter of voting members (126 of 502) can petition for a special meeting. The petition must use “a form to be developed and authorized by the Secretary.” The Secretary “shall have authority to verify any signature or other indication of assent.” (Art. VII, §D(3))

What happened: Raymond Garcia circulated the petition and collected signatures. Andrews, as Secretary, verified the signatures and confirmed the petition met the threshold.

Conflict of Interest

The bylaws assign petition verification to the Secretary. Andrews is the Secretary. Andrews also distributed the petition on February 13, exchanged 14 emails with former Chair Williams about the effort in the weeks before, and then verified the signatures on the same petition he helped organize. The bylaws do not contemplate a scenario where the Secretary is also a participant in the petition effort.

Step 2: The Challenge

What the bylaws say: “Any such meeting request may be challenged by any voting member and such challenge shall be heard and determined as provided by Article XV.” Critically: “If the meeting request has been challenged before the Executive Committee, the period for issuing the call shall be extended while the challenge is pending (including any subsequent appeal from the Executive Committee).” (Art. VII, §D(3))

What happened: Horn’s Executive Committee declared the petition “irregular” — a challenge under the bylaws. Under the provision above, this should have extended the deadline for calling the meeting while the challenge was resolved.

Step 3: The Meeting Call

What the bylaws say: If unchallenged, “the meeting shall be called by the Chairman within ten days.” If the Chairman fails to call it, “any voting member may issue the call.” The Secretary can call meetings only “in the event when both Chairman and Vice-Chairman are absent or unable to act.” (Art. VII, §D(2)–(3))

What happened: Andrews issued the meeting call before the EC’s challenge was resolved. The petitioners’ position is that Horn failed to call the meeting within the required time, forfeiting her authority. Horn’s position is that the EC challenge extended the deadline, so she had not yet “failed” to act.

The Dispute

This is the central procedural question. The bylaws explicitly state that a challenge extends the calling period. If that extension applied, Andrews called the meeting before he had the authority to do so. If it did not — because the petitioners consider the challenge itself improper — then the fallback provision allowed any voting member to issue the call. Both sides cite the same bylaws section to reach opposite conclusions.

Step 4: Who Chaired

What the bylaws say: The Chairman shall “Issue the call and preside at all meetings of the CRC and the Executive Committee.” (Art. V, §B.1.b)

What happened: Horn was not present. Andrews chaired the meeting. He appointed all committee positions (LeBlanc, Hulcom, Goodall, Ferguson), controlled the agenda, and temporarily handed the gavel to Goodall during his own roughly six-minute speech. When Andrews finished and asked for the gavel back, Goodall declined, stating it was “more appropriate” for him to continue chairing. Goodall chaired for approximately 23 minutes — through the amendment debate and vote — before eventually returning control to Andrews for the final credentials vote and adjournment.

At this point, one person — Andrews — had verified the petition, called the meeting, chaired the meeting, appointed all the supporting roles, and was about to deliver the speech making the case against the Chair.

Step 5: The Votes

Every vote taken at this meeting depends on the meeting having been properly called. If the meeting call is disputed, the authority of the votes is disputed.

Vote Results Table
Action Taken Bylaws Requirement Vote Result Status
Quorum One-third of voting members (Art. VII, §F). For 502 eligible, that is 168. 246 credentialed Met
Suspend spending authority The bylaws assign budget approval to the Executive Committee (Art. IX, §B.2), not the SCC. The SCC voted under its powers as defined in Art. III, §B. 195 yes, 11 no (90%) Disputed — EC authority
Cease litigation No specific bylaws provision governs party litigation decisions. Voted under Art. III, §B. 204 yes, 2 no (94%) No specific rule
No confidence + resignation request No provision for a no-confidence vote exists anywhere in the bylaws. Member John Fielding stated on the record: “In a sense this vote is symbolic… that is not going to affect Brita’s continuation in office.” 198 yes, 9 no (90%) Not in bylaws
Actual removal Requires three-fifths of the entire membership at a meeting called for that purpose, with 15 days written notice (Art. V, §C). That is 302 yes votes. Not attempted Would need 302; only 246 present

Note on vote infrastructure: All votes were conducted via anonymous Zoom polls operated by Cody LeBlanc through CB Strategic Consulting’s Zoom account. The poll participation data — who voted, how they voted, whether all credentialed members participated in each poll — is held exclusively by CB Strategic. This data has not been made available for independent examination. The vote totals above are as read aloud by LeBlanc during the meeting and captured on the YouTube stream (EX-012). There is no independent mechanism to verify them.

The Chain

Andrews coordinated with Williams via party email → security review discovered the communications → Andrews’ email suspended during the review → Andrews attributed the suspension to Horn without disclosing the review or its findings → Garcia circulated petition → Andrews verified the petition he helped organize → EC challenged the petition → Andrews called the meeting before the challenge was resolved → Andrews chaired the meeting he called → Andrews appointed all committee positions → Andrews delivered the speech arguing for removal → votes taken at a meeting whose authority is in dispute.

The bylaws provide a legitimate mechanism for members to petition for a special meeting. That mechanism was used. But the person who verified it, called it, chaired it, and argued at it was the same person — and the challenge process that should have paused the timeline was bypassed. Whether the resulting votes carry legal weight depends on whether the meeting was properly called. That question is unresolved.

The meeting was hosted on a Zoom account belonging to CB Strategic Consulting and live-streamed on their YouTube channel. No public record of this entity exists.

What We Found
  • Not a registered business. No entity named “CB Strategic Consulting” exists in the Colorado Secretary of State database.
  • YouTube channel created 12 days before the meeting (February 10, 2026). One video. 19 subscribers. Channel description: “a governance and organizational strategy firm focused on strengthening boards, nonprofits, and mission-driven organizations.”
  • Website is a phpList newsletter subscription portal (admin@cbstrategicconsulting.com). Domain registered April 27, 2024 through Name.com (Denver, CO) with the owner’s identity hidden behind Domain Protection Services, Inc.
  • No LinkedIn company page. No results in web searches. No public footprint of any kind.
  • A second live stream is already scheduled for March 3 — the day after Horn’s March 2 SCC meeting.
Known Connections

Cody LeBlanc operated the Zoom and YouTube stream. His registered business (GENCOD LLC) has no connection to CB Strategic. He ran the technology but does not appear to own the entity.

The domain cbstrategicconsulting.com was registered April 27, 2024 through Name.com, Inc. (Denver, CO). The registrant’s identity is hidden behind Domain Protection Services, Inc. IP: 169.63.242.100. WHOIS captured Feb 24, 2026. Source: EX-011 (WHOIS screenshot). The entity behind the domain has not been identified.

Dave Williams was not part of the operations team. He did not chair the meeting, run the polls, or manage credentials. But he was on the call — and Andrews recognized him by name from the chair.

Williams spoke three times during the meeting, all on the budget suspension item. He did not speak on the no-confidence vote, the cease-legal-action vote (which involved parties connected to the organizing effort — Ferguson was a co-plaintiff in the El Paso County case, Klenda a defendant), or the bylaws amendment. All three statements concerned practical fiscal questions about keeping the caucus and assembly running.

Transcript: Williams' Three Statements
“I support this but I would make a modification given that we’re really close to the caucus and the state assembly. I don’t think we can afford to furlough Alec Hannah because he seems to be the only guy putting in a lot of the leg work and he should be paid accordingly for that. I do agree that Brita or any other individuals, they certainly shouldn’t take on compensation per se, but I think we should allow for Alec to continue to be paid.” — Dave Williams, ~42:29 • Budget suspension debate • Source: YouTube (CB Strategic Consulting, Feb 21, 2026)
“I think that’s fine. I actually I’m not certain that we need to actually insert that level of specificity, but in order to keep business moving along, I’m happy to do that. And I’ll go ahead and retract my previous amendment and then reoffer.” — Dave Williams, ~48:44 • Retracting and reoffering his amendment • Source: YouTube (CB Strategic Consulting, Feb 21, 2026)
“I would ask everyone to have patience… I want to point out that Cody has been very diligent about putting the final question in the actual poll. So if there is a concern about what are we voting on, read the poll because it has the question in it.” — Dave Williams, ~1:13:57 • Calming confused members • Source: YouTube (CB Strategic Consulting, Feb 21, 2026)

He proposed practical amendments, was gracious when asked to modify them, calmed confusion, and kept things moving. Other members deferred to him — Holtorf referenced “extraordinary circumstances as Mr. Williams mentioned”; Cherry Porter said “Dave just said what I was going to say.”

Meanwhile, his coordination with Andrews before the meeting — 14 emails, 86% (12 of 14) subsequently deleted — and his direction to Ferguson to include the removal question on the petition form are documented in the prior acts.

Credentialing Evidence: Red Book, Voter Roll, El Paso Bylaws

The Red Book

The COGOP Red Book — the party’s official roster of State Central Committee members — lists Williams on the Former Members sheet:

OrganizationEl Paso County
TitleBonus Member
NameDavid “Dave” Williams
Address[Colorado Springs, CO 80922 — full address redacted]
Reason for removalMoved

He does not appear on the active Members sheet under any county. He was not re-seated as a bonus member elsewhere. His email, phone number, and address match no entry in the current roster.

The Voter Roll Contradiction

Colorado Secretary of State voter registration records (EX-003, snapshot February 9, 2026) show:

NameDavid Alan Williams
CountyEl Paso
PartyRepublican
StatusActive
Address[Unchanged from Red Book entry — redacted]
Registered sinceAugust 18, 2004

The Red Book says he “Moved.” His voter registration — at the same address the Red Book lists — is still Active in El Paso County as of twelve days before the meeting.

What the El Paso County Bylaws Say

The El Paso County Republican Central Committee Bylaws (revised January 17, 2026 — five weeks before this meeting) address bonus members directly:

Article XI, §11.01Bonus Member candidates must meet the eligibility requirements of Article 6.01: “registered Republican electors and residents of the State of Colorado for one (1) year.”
Article XI, §11.03A.1Causes for removal include: “The person has moved from the county or has changed party affiliation.”
Article VII, §7.01C.5The Executive Committee “shall determine whether vacancies exist… in the position of ‘bonus member.’”
Article III, §3.01Members must “reside within El Paso County.”

If Williams moved — as the Red Book indicates — then §11.03A.1 applies: moving from the county is a listed cause for removal. The Executive Committee is responsible for determining whether that vacancy exists (§7.01C.5). No documentation of such a determination has been identified.

The Federal Employment Question

Public reporting and Williams’ own social media confirm the picture. On February 28, 2025, the Colorado Springs Gazette reported that “Republican sources told Colorado Politics that Williams has landed a job with the Trump administration but couldn’t provide specifics.” Williams’ Facebook profile now provides those specifics: he lists his current position as Senior Advisor, International Trade Administration (ITA), Department of Commerce, effective July 1, 2025. His bio reads: “Senior Advisor to the ITA at Trump #47.” This is a political appointee role. The ITA is headquartered at 1401 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC.

Williams’ Facebook still lists his location as “Colorado Springs, CO” — it does not confirm a move. However, Senior Advisor roles at federal agencies typically require physical presence in Washington. Inference He likely maintains a Colorado Springs address while working in DC. His voter registration remains active at the same Colorado Springs address the Red Book lists.

Williams is a federal political appointee who took a position in Washington, DC, while continuing to coordinate state party removal operations via email (documented: proxy responses on behalf of Andrews, petition forms to county chairs, all from repdavewilliams@gmail.com).

Credentialing Record

The credentials committee was chaired by Hulcom, appointed by Andrews. Williams participated in the meeting and was recognized by Andrews from the chair. The Red Book lists Williams as a former member. The El Paso County bylaws state that moving from the county is cause for removal. Williams’ own Facebook profile identifies him as a Senior Advisor at the International Trade Administration in Washington, DC — a federal political appointee since July 1, 2025. Williams’ standing to participate in the meeting and the authorization for his credentialing are not documented in the materials reviewed.

Two meetings, two dates

Chairwoman Horn called the legitimate SCC meeting for Monday, March 2. The unauthorized group scheduled a separate parallel meeting for Tuesday, March 3. CB Strategic Consulting has a live stream pre-scheduled for March 3. The Restore Real Colorado newsletter (Feb 25; Gmail ID: 19c97945523855d8) directed members to attend “Brita’s Monday, March 2 zoom meeting” and “send the same message to her.”

After the meeting formally ended, the YouTube stream kept running. Participants discussed their strategy for the next meeting openly, not realizing they were still being broadcast.

“Cody, would you please stop the live stream? This is private.” — Unidentified participant, post-adjournment • Source: YouTube (CB Strategic Consulting, Feb 21, 2026)

What they discussed: attend Horn’s March 2 SCC meeting, then hold their own meeting on March 3 and vote on the same three agenda items again.

CB Strategic Consulting already has a live stream scheduled for March 3.

Who Was Watching

The YouTube stream had 183 views and six comments. Five of the six came from one account: @SueSherrer. She thanked CB Strategic Consulting by name, asked them to stream the March 3 meeting, referenced specific procedural details, and mentioned participants by name with timestamps. She either attended the meeting or watched the stream closely.

Her most notable comment: “Much Thanks to CB Strategic Consulting for this live stream. I hope you will also do the March 3rd meeting.”

Voter registration records identify her as Sandra Sue Sherrer, a Republican in Pueblo County (CD-3, SD-3, HD-46), registered since November 2021.

The Removal Math

Removal requires 302 yes votes (3/5 of all 502 members). 246 were credentialed. Removal was not attempted. See Act V: The Math for the full accounting of what this meeting cost and what it produced.

ACT V

The Ledger

Quantified outcomes and procedural analysis.

Removal of the Chair requires three-fifths of the entire voting membership of the State Central Committee. Not three-fifths of those present. Three-fifths of all 502 voting members. That number is 302.

246 members were credentialed on February 21.

Even if every single credentialed member voted to remove Horn — unanimously, without a single dissent — the count would be 246. The threshold is 302. The gap is 56.

302
Votes needed for removal
3/5 of 502 voting members (Art. V §C.1)
246
Members credentialed
Feb 21, 2026 — Zoom meeting
56
The gap
Votes short even with unanimous support
Proxies are forbidden in electronic meetings (Art. VII §G). The meeting format was selected by Andrews, not the Chair. With 246 credentialed members and no proxy mechanism, the 302-vote threshold could not be reached.

A similar removal attempt was made on July 27, 2024. A faction within the party attempted to remove then-Chairman Dave Williams using the same bylaws provisions. That attempt went to court. Judge Eric Bentley invalidated it for procedural deficiencies (Case 2024CV31638) — the meeting did not reach the three-fifths threshold of the entire membership, and the process was challenged on multiple procedural grounds. A related ruling by Judge Henderson dismissed jurisdictional claims, holding that courts cannot adjudicate internal party disputes (Case 2024CV31549; EX-006).

The current attempt follows the same path. The same bylaws questions. The same structural problems. With additional procedural issues layered on top: a Secretary overriding the Executive Committee, selecting the meeting format without Chair authorization, and providing insufficient notice.

Bentley Precedent Comparison: 2024 vs. 2026
FactorAug 2024 (Williams Removal)Feb 2026 (Horn Attempt)
Called by Chairman?DisputedNo — called by Secretary
EC approved?ChallengedNo — EC ruled petition invalid
3/5 of entire membership?No (161 of 502)Not yet determined
15-day mailed notice?Disputed13 days, email only
Chair authorized format?N/A (in-person)No — Horn did not authorize
Court resultInvalidated by Judge BentleyPending

Source: Case 2024CV31638 (Judge Bentley, quorum ruling); Case 2024CV31549 (Judge Henderson, jurisdiction ruling; EX-006); Case 2025CV30292 (current proceedings); COGOP Bylaws Art. V §C, Art. VII §§D, E, G (EX-005).

Two attempts in two years. Both following the same procedural pattern. The first was invalidated by the courts. The second could not reach the required threshold even with perfect attendance. The bylaws have a removal mechanism — but that mechanism has requirements, and neither attempt met them.

Eight distinct bylaws violations have been identified in the February 21 meeting call and process. They span the chain of authority for calling meetings, the validity of the underlying petition, notice requirements, meeting format selection, amendment procedures, and proxy rules. Each one is documented against specific articles and sections of the COGOP Bylaws as amended August 31, 2024 (effective January 1, 2025), filed as Exhibit A in Case 2025CV30292.

All 8 Identified Bylaws Violations
#ViolationCitationDetail
1 Meeting Call Authority Art. VII §D.2 Secretary may call only if Chairman AND Vice-Chair are absent or unable. Horn was neither.
2 EC Determination Art. VII §D.3 EC ruled petition invalid. No mechanism for one officer to override an Executive Committee determination.
3 Petition Call Sequence Art. VII §D.3 Fallback to “any voting member” only triggers after an unchallenged petition. This one was challenged and rejected.
4 Notice Period and Method Art. V §C.2 15 days’ mailed notice required. Feb 8 notice was 13 days, email only. Bylaw amendment on agenda triggers 30-day requirement — making this 17 days short.
5 3/5 Membership Threshold Art. V §C.1 + App. A Rule 35 Removal requires 302 of 502 voting members voting yes (3/5 rounds up).
6 Meeting Format Selection Art. VII §G Zoom format selected by Andrews, not authorized by the Chair. Bylaws specify format is “at the discretion of the Chairman.”
7 Amendment Procedure Art. XX §A Agenda item #2 proposes striking bylaw language. Amendments require Bylaws Committee review and 30 days’ mailed notice. Had neither.
8 Electronic Proxy Ban Art. VII §G “Proxies shall be forbidden” in electronic meetings, making the 3/5 threshold harder to reach.

Source: Bylaws of the Colorado Republican State Central Committee, Amendments Adopted August 31, 2024 (Effective January 1, 2025). Filed as Exhibit A in Case 2025CV30292.

246 credentialed members gave up a Saturday morning for this meeting. Credentialing opened at 8:00 AM. The meeting convened at 10:30 AM. The proceedings ran past noon. That is a minimum of 2.5 hours per attendee — not counting preparation, travel time for those who gathered at watch locations, or the weeks of organizational effort that preceded it.

246 members attended a meeting lasting approximately 2.5 hours. The 302-vote removal threshold could not have been reached with 246 members present. Zero votes were taken on the removal question. Zero bylaws were amended. Zero organizational decisions were made.

600+
Person-hours spent
246 members × 2.5+ hours minimum
0
Binding outcomes
No votes, no amendments, no decisions
219
Court filings
Case 2025CV30292 alone — still active

$2.4 million total executive board budget (per Feb 21 meeting agenda, Agenda Item #1). Two Vice-Chairs have resigned in less than 12 months. Multiple departures from party leadership and volunteer positions during the current term. Democrats hold a near-supermajority in the Colorado General Assembly. The 2026 election cycle is underway.

37
State legislative seats with no Republican candidate
House and Senate districts · TRACER data as of Feb 25, 2026
45%
Of 83 state legislative races uncontested
No candidate filed, announced, or considering
18
Days until filing deadline
March 18, 2026

As of the date of this report, the individuals documented in this briefing continue to hold party offices. The procedural and communication methods described — petition distribution, BCC lists, RRC newsletter, meeting operations — were employed through publicly available party infrastructure.

Sources for every claim are cited inline: Gmail message IDs, administrative audit log timestamps, court case numbers, and public record references. Any party officer with administrative access to the Google Workspace can verify the email evidence independently.

Related Documents
Andrews Investigative Findings Andrews Evidence Packet
Litigation Network — 7 Cases
Evidence Index · COGOP Bylaws · Henderson Jurisdictional Ruling · Case 2025CV30292 Docket